The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed New Hampshire officials to limit when voters may use a student ID to receive a ballot, agreeing that a lower court ruling that blocked enforcement of the policy was too close to Election Day.
The unsigned order was a win for New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan, a Republican, and the Republican National Committee, which had supported Scanlan in the fight.
The court did not provide a vote count, though it did provide a brief explanation, invoking the “Purcell principle” that warns against last-minute decisions from courts that change election rules.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal, wrote a brief dissent questioning the application of the Purcell doctrine.
Trump tells Ramaswamy not to take down controversial ad featuring his opponent’s estranged mother
New Hampshire voters will fill an open Senate seat in November to replace the retiring Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen. A recent CNN poll found that Democrats enjoy a 31 percentage point advantage over Republicans among younger adults.
Lower federal courts allowed the state to enforce the central prohibition of a law enacted by the state legislature this spring. Under that law, student IDs on their own may no longer be used to verify a voter’s identity. But state law also includes a “safety valve” that allows voters to attempt to prove their identity through other means and the fight at the Supreme Court was about whether, in those circumstances, student IDs could be used as one factor, along with other evidence, to help officials identify people requesting a ballot.
When New Hampshire officials interpreted the new state law as shutting off the ability to use student IDs even in those circumstances, a voting rights group called Coalition for Open Democracy sued. A federal district court blocked enforcement of that interpretation on October 2.
New Hampshire filed an emergency appeal at the Supreme Court arguing that the Purcell opinion meant should decide the case in its favor. The RNC had warned that the lower court’s order “threatens to disrupt identity verification in New Hampshire’s looming elections.”
The Supreme Court has been called on to address several high-profile election disputes heading into next month’s midterms, most notably a decision in mid-September rejecting President Donald Trump’s proposal to change how mail ballots are sent to voters across the country.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
