Running complicated algorithms on quantum computing hardware is going to require the use of logical qubits, where collections of hardware qubits are linked together in ways that allow errors to be detected and corrected. In general, the more hardware qubits you dedicate to each logical qubit, the better the chances are of identifying errors. But, given that the hardware qubits are prone to errors, adding more of them also increases the probability that errors will occur. If the hardware error rate is too high, then growing the logical qubit will only make matters worse.
Fortunately, several companies have demonstrated hardware where the error rate is not too high. Several demonstrations show logical qubits are beyond the breakeven point, where adding more qubits improves performance. The problem is that the improvement isn’t very dramatic. To lower error rates to levels we’ll need to run complex algorithms, we’d have to add a completely impractical number of qubits to each logical qubit.
On Monday, Quantinuum announced that its current generation of hardware is capable of scaling well beyond the breakeven point. Each step up in the size of logical qubits improved some measures of their performance by a factor of over 10.
To understand the results, we must take a little detour through the ideas behind error correction. A logical qubit consists of a set of qubits that hold data, and another set that is used for measurements, all of them entangled to others. There are various error correction “codes,” each of which has a different geometry of entangled connections among its constituent qubits. During operations, measurements of the appropriate qubits produce what’s called “syndrome data,” which can be interpreted to provide an indication of whether an error has occurred within the logical qubit, as well as where and its nature.
Depending on their geometry, error codes have a number of key properties: how many hardware qubits are needed for it to work, how many individual logical qubits it hosts, and something called the distance, which is a rough measure of how many errors can occur simultaneously before the logical qubit fails.
