You have reached your maximum number of saved items.
Remove items from your saved list to add more.
You've used all of your gift articles. 3 more will become available on the 1st of every month.
Brendan Kissane, the director of public prosecutions, rejected the submission that there was a “fundamental irregularity” in Patterson’s trial as the jury briefly stayed in the same hotel as some prosecutors and police, which the defence argued “fatally undermined the integrity of the verdicts”.
Kissane said the evidence showed there was “no social contact between any juror and any other person”.
He said he believed trial judge Christopher Beale would have stopped the jury staying at the same hotel as some prosecutors and police in the Latrobe Valley had he known about it earlier. But he argued it was unintentional due to limited accommodation options and did not cause any fundamental irregularity as there was no evidence any prosecution figures spoke to jurors.
The prosecution also argued the iNaturalist material was part of a collection of evidence that taken together demonstrated that the applicant had opportunity to deliberately source death cap mushrooms at a time close to the lunch, and on the prosecution case, did so.
Erin Patterson’s defence team submitted seven reasons the mushroom murderer’s convictions should be overturned because:
As three Court of Appeal justices prepare to hand down their decision on Erin Patterson’s triple murder conviction, this ruling could see her set for a retrial or facing life behind bars without parole.
With her legal team pointing to seven grounds for appeal and prosecutors pushing for an increased sentence, today’s outcome will decide the next chapter in what is known across the country as the mushroom murders.
My name is Erin Pearson, and I have covered this case for more than two years. Today, I will be in court providing constant updates as they happen.
Follow along with us – the hearing is not expected to go on for too long.
